Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, premises considered, finding the affirmative defenses of the defendants to have been duly proved and with merit, this case is hereby ordered DISMISSED. There being no evidence presented to prove the counterclaims of the defendant, the same is also DISMISSED. SO ORDERED.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, finding the affirmative defenses of the defendants to have been duly proved and with merit, this case is hereby ordered DISMISSED. There being no evidence presented to prove the counterclaims of the defendant, the same is also DISMISSED. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 164695 - HEIRS OF JOSE BARREDO, NAMELY, LOLITA BARREDO, ANNALIZA BARREDO AND MARICHU BARREDO-EPE, REPRESENTED BY MARICHU BARREDO-EPE, VS. LAVOISER BESAÑES.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 164695 -
CaseG.R. No. 230307 - HEIRS OF WILFREDO C. BOTENES, V. MUNICIPALITY OF CARMEN, DAVAO, REPRESENTED BY MUNICIPAL MAYOR GONZALO O. CUARENTA, AND RURAL BANK OF PANABO (DAVAO), INC..D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 230307 -
Case(BOTH DECEASED), NAMELY: OLIVER B. SUYAM, MABLE B. SUYAM, CHRISTOPHER B. SUYAM, ABEL B. SUYAM, AND CHESTER B. SUYAM, REPRESENTED BY THEIR ATTORNEY-INFACT AND ON HIS OWN BEHALF, TELESFORO B. SUYAM, V. HEIRS OF FELICIANO JULATON @ PONCIANO, NAMELY: LUCINA J. BADUA, SEMEON JULATON, JULIANA J. BUCASAS,
G.R. No. 209081 -