TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , for undue delay in rendering a decision or order and for violating the clear provisions of A.M. No. 01-1-07-SC, respondent Executive Judge Oscar E.
WHEREFORE , for undue delay in rendering a decision or order and for violating the clear provisions of A.M. No. 01-1-07-SC, respondent Executive Judge Oscar E. Dinopol of the Regional Trial Court, Branch 24, Koronadal City, is FINED in the amount of P11,000. He is sternly warned that a repetition of the same or similar act in the future shall be dealt with by the Court more severely. SO ORDERED.
A.M. No. RTJ-03-1744 (formerly OCA IPI No. 02-1425-RTJ) - PROSECUTOR ROBERT M. VISBAL, COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE ROGELIO C. SESCON, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 9, TACLOBAN CITY.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. No. RTJ-03-1744
CaseA.M. No. RTJ-06-1994 (FORMERLY A.M. NO. 06-240-RTC) - OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR, COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE LEONCIO M. JANOLO, JR., OFFICER-IN-CHARGE ESPERANZA F. GELLEZ, CIVIL CLERK-IN-CHARGE MARCO A. BOCO AND CRIMINAL CLERK- IN-CHARGE FILBERT A. MAGTIBAY, ALL OF THE REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANC
A.M. No. RTJ-06-1994
CaseA.M. No. MTJ-12-1812 [Formerly A.M. OCA IPI No. 10-2250-MTJ] - PILAR S. TAÑOCO, COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE INOCENCIO B. SAGUN, JR., PRESIDING JUDGE, MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT IN CITIES, BRANCH 3, CABANATUAN CITY.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. No. MTJ-12-1812