TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, in view of all the foregoing, the Court finds that the evidence on record preponderates in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiffs and hereby orders the above-entitled case DISMISSED. The counterclaim is also DISMISSED. No pronouncement as to costs. SO ORDERED.
WHEREFORE, in view of all the foregoing, the Court finds that the evidence on record preponderates in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiffs and hereby orders the above-entitled case DISMISSED. The counterclaim is also DISMISSED. No pronouncement as to costs. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 216024 - SPS. ERNESTO V. YU AND ELSIE YU, VS. EULOGIO A. TOPACIO, JR..DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 216024 -
CaseMARCELINO M. FLORETE, JR., MARIA ELENA F. MUYCO AND RAUL A. MUYCO, VS. ROGELIO M. FLORETE, IMELDA C. FLORETE, DIAMEL CORPORATION, ROGELIO C. FLORETE JR., AND MARGARET RUTH C. FLORETE.
G.R. No. 174909 -
CaseG.R. No. 168499 - SPOUSES EROSTO SANTIAGO AND NELSIE SANTIAGO, VS. MANCER VILLAMOR, CARLOS VILLAMOR, JOHN VILLAMOR AND DOMINGO VILLAMOR, JR..D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 168499 -