Back to Search
JurisprudenceG.R. No. 174909 -

MARCELINO M. FLORETE, JR., MARIA ELENA F. MUYCO AND RAUL A. MUYCO, VS. ROGELIO M. FLORETE, IMELDA C. FLORETE, DIAMEL CORPORATION, ROGELIO C. FLORETE JR., AND MARGARET RUTH C. FLORETE.

Cited Laws

RA 569RA 569,RA 496RA 501RA 501,RA 325,RA 325
Share:

TL;DR — Ruling

WHEREFORE, premises duly considered, the instant "Complaint" of the plaintiffs is hereby DISMISSED for lack of merit. The "Counterclaim" of defendant Rogelio Florete Sr. is hereby given DUE COURSE but only insofar as the claims for moral and exemplary damages are concerned. Consequently, the plaintiffs herein are hereby ordered to pay, jointly and severally, defendant Rogelio Florete Sr.

Decision

Ruling

WHEREFORE, premises duly considered, the instant "Complaint" of the plaintiffs is hereby DISMISSED for lack of merit. The "Counterclaim" of defendant Rogelio Florete Sr. is hereby given DUE COURSE but only insofar as the claims for moral and exemplary damages are concerned. Consequently, the plaintiffs herein are hereby ordered to pay, jointly and severally, defendant Rogelio Florete Sr., the following sums, to wit: 1. TWENTY FIVE MILLION PESOS (P25,000,000.00) as and for MORAL DAMAGES; and, 2. FIVE MILLION PESOS (P5,000,000.00) as and for EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. The "Counterclaim(s)" of the other defendants and the prayer for the recovery of attorney's fees and litigation expenses of defendant Rogelio Florete, Sr. are hereby DISMISSED likewise for lack of merit. SO ORDERED.