Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE the Petition is DENIED . The 21 October 2009 Decision and 16 December 2009 Resolution of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No.
Accordingly, the finding of illegal dismissal must be upheld. [21] Article 279 of the Labor Code provides that an employee who is unjustly dismissed from work shall be entitled to reinstatement without loss of seniority rights and other privileges; to his full back wages, inclusive of allowances; and to other applicable benefits or their monetary equivalent computed from the time compensation was withheld up to the time of actual reinstatement. [22] However, in recognition of the strained relations between petitioners and respondent, the former are instead liable to give separation pay as found by the CA. WHEREFORE the Petition is DENIED . The 21 October 2009 Decision and 16 December 2009 Resolution of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 108996 are hereby AFFIRMED . SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 249092 - ARMANDO N. SERRANO, VS. LOXON PHILIPPINES, INC. E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 249092 -
CaseG.R. No. 254697 - TRAVELOKA PHILIPPINES, INC. AND YADY GUITANA, VS. PONCEVIC CAPINO CEBALLOS, JR..R E S O L U T I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 254697 -
CaseG.R. No. 194001 - MARIA VILMA G. DOCTOR AND JAIME LAO, JR., VS. NII ENTERPRISES AND/OR MRS. NILDA C. IGNACIO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 194001 -