Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , the petition is GRANTED . The Decision dated July 31, 2002 and the Resolution dated July 24, 2003 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. CV No.
WHEREFORE , the petition is GRANTED . The Decision dated July 31, 2002 and the Resolution dated July 24, 2003 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. CV No. 54291 are hereby SET ASIDE . The Decision dated August 5, 1996 of the Regional Trial Court of Pasig City, Branch 156, in Civil Case No. 64924, dismissing the case for lack of merit, is REINSTATED . Costs against the respondent. SO ORDERED.
G.R. NO. 169177 - SPS. DAN T. PAGUIRIGAN AND MARY JANE PAGUIRIGAN, VS. PILHINO SALES CORPORATION. DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 169177 -
CaseG.R. No. 155943 - PILAR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, VS. THE HON. COURT OF APPEALS, SPOUSES PEPITO L. NG AND VIOLETA N. NG, AND SPOUSES ANTONIO V. MARTEL, JR. AND JULIANA TICSON.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 155943 -
CaseG.R. NO. 155737 - R TRANSPORT CORPORATION, VS. PHILIPPINE HAWK TRANSPORT CORPORATION.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 155737 -