Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, this Office finds substantial evidence to hold x x x [Buenaflor] x x x GUILTY of GRAVE MISCONDUCT, x x x and hereby orders their DISMISSAL from office with FORFEITURE of retirement benefits, and perpetual disqualification from reemployment in government service. x x x x x x x x x SO ORDERED.
WHEREFORE, this Office finds substantial evidence to hold x x x [Buenaflor] x x x GUILTY of GRAVE MISCONDUCT, x x x and hereby orders their DISMISSAL from office with FORFEITURE of retirement benefits, and perpetual disqualification from reemployment in government service. x x x x x x x x x SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 197299 - OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, VS. RODRIGO V. MAPOY AND DON EMMANUEL R. REGALARIO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 197299 -
CaseG.R. No. 258888 - ROLANDO B. ZOLETA, VS. INVESTIGATING STAFF, INTERNAL AFFAIRS BOARD, OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, REPRESENTED BY: GIPO III ALFRED YANN G. OGUIS AND AGIO OMAR R. LEANO,**.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 258888 -
CaseG.R. No. 197307 - FLOR GUPILAN-AGUILAR AND HONORE R. HERNANDEZ, VS. OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, REPRESENTED BY HON. SIMEON V. MARCELO; AND PNP-CIDG, REPRESENTED BY DIR. EDUARDO MATILLANO.
G.R. No. 197307 -