Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , respondents Rolando B. Zoleta and Elias B. Caputolan, Jr. are found GUILTY of Grave Misconduct, Serious Dishonesty and [sic] Conduct Prejudicial to the Best Interest of the Service, and are meted the penalty of Dismissal from the Service , together with its accessory penalties.
WHEREFORE , respondents Rolando B. Zoleta and Elias B. Caputolan, Jr. are found GUILTY of Grave Misconduct, Serious Dishonesty and [sic] Conduct Prejudicial to the Best Interest of the Service, and are meted the penalty of Dismissal from the Service , together with its accessory penalties. In the event that the penalty of Dismissal can no longer be enforced due to respondents' separation from the service, the same shall be converted into a Fine in the amount equivalent to their salary for one (1) year, payable to the Office of the Ombudsman, and may be deductible from their retirement benefits, accrued leave credits or any receivables by respondents from their office. It shall be understood that the accessory penalties attached to the principal penalty of Dismissal shall continue to be imposed. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 197299 - OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, VS. RODRIGO V. MAPOY AND DON EMMANUEL R. REGALARIO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 197299 -
CaseG.R. No. 197307 - FLOR GUPILAN-AGUILAR AND HONORE R. HERNANDEZ, VS. OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, REPRESENTED BY HON. SIMEON V. MARCELO; AND PNP-CIDG, REPRESENTED BY DIR. EDUARDO MATILLANO.
G.R. No. 197307 -
CaseG.R. No. 232844 - HEIRS OF NELSON CABRERA BUENAFLOR, NAMELY, PURA R. BUENAFLOR, KAREVA R. BUENAFLOR, KENNETH R. BUENAFLOR, PAUL R. BUENAFLOR AND MARK R. BUENAFLOR. VS. FIELD INVESTIGATION OFFICE, OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 232844 -