Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, decision is hereby rendered as follows: 1. Ordering the immediate reinstatement of complainant as the Bonafide tenant-lessee to the subject landholding; 2. Ordering the cancellation of the existing leasehold contract between defendants and one Asuncion Espinosa, and in lieu thereof, the execution of a leasehold contract as between herein complainant and defendants; 3.
WHEREFORE, decision is hereby rendered as follows: 1. Ordering the immediate reinstatement of complainant as the Bonafide tenant-lessee to the subject landholding; 2. Ordering the cancellation of the existing leasehold contract between defendants and one Asuncion Espinosa, and in lieu thereof, the execution of a leasehold contract as between herein complainant and defendants; 3. Ordering the respondents to account for and pay to the complainant his share or the amount in excess of his rentals after deducting the expenses in the harvest of November, 1995 and February 1996 based on the pesadas from the copra buyer; 4. Ordering respondents to pay the amount of P10,000 as in (sic) Attorneys Fees and the amount of P5,000 as litigation expenses. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 222768 - JOSEFINA ARINES-ALBALANTE AND JUANA ARINES, VS. SALVACION REYES AND ISRAEL REYES. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 222768 -
CaseA.M. No. MTJ-01-1350 - LORENZO PASCUAL, RODOLFO FELIX, EDDIE BARLAN, CELSO DIZON MANEJA, AND NARDITO METURADA, COMPLAINANTS, VS. JUDGE CESAR M. DUMLAO, MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT, SAN MATEO, ISABELA.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. No. MTJ-01-1350