Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, the foregoing considered, judgment is hereby rendered in favor of the complainants, and other issue as follows: 1. Ordering the respondents to reinstate complainant Josefina Arines-Alba[l]ate as agricultural lessee of the subject landholding, and for the former to maintain and respect the latter's possession and cultivation of the same; 2.
WHEREFORE, the foregoing considered, judgment is hereby rendered in favor of the complainants, and other issue as follows: 1. Ordering the respondents to reinstate complainant Josefina Arines-Alba[l]ate as agricultural lessee of the subject landholding, and for the former to maintain and respect the latter's possession and cultivation of the same; 2. Ordering the respondents to pay the complainants sixty (60) cavans ofpalay per cropping, from the time of the institution of this action up to its final termination. SO ORDERED.
AND VENERANDA ADALID, VS. SIEGFREDO FERNANDEZ.
G.R. No. 137509 -
CaseG.R. No. 115794 - ANASTACIO MANANGAN, VS. ANGEL DELOS REYES, GERMAN DELOS REYES, AURELLANA DELOS REYES, JOSEFINA DELOS REYES AND INOCENCIO DELOS REYES. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 115794 -
CaseA.M. No. MTJ-01-1350 - LORENZO PASCUAL, RODOLFO FELIX, EDDIE BARLAN, CELSO DIZON MANEJA, AND NARDITO METURADA, COMPLAINANTS, VS. JUDGE CESAR M. DUMLAO, MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT, SAN MATEO, ISABELA.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. No. MTJ-01-1350