Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, premises above considered, the above-entitled case filed against defendant [Expresscredit] Financing Corporation is hereby ordered DISMISSED for lack of merit. Counterclaims filed by defendant [Expresscredit] Financing Corporation against herein plaintiffs are likewise ordered DISMISSED. No pronouncement as to the costs of the suit. SO ORDERED.
WHEREFORE, premises above considered, the above-entitled case filed against defendant [Expresscredit] Financing Corporation is hereby ordered DISMISSED for lack of merit. Counterclaims filed by defendant [Expresscredit] Financing Corporation against herein plaintiffs are likewise ordered DISMISSED. No pronouncement as to the costs of the suit. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 235604 - SPOUSES LEONARDO AND MARILYN ANGELES, FOR THEMSELVES AND AS ATTORNEY-IN-FACT OF OLYMPIA C. BERNABE, AURORA ANGELES, PETER A. CARTAGENA, FRANCISCO A. CARTAGENA III, AND MANY PLACES, INC., VS. TRADERS ROYAL BANK (NOW KNOWN AS BANK OF COMMERCE).DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 235604 -
CaseG.R. NO. 158232 - FUJITSU COMPUTER PRODUCTS CORPORATION OF THE PHILIPPINES AND ERNESTO ESPINOSA, VS. THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS, VICTOR DE GUZMAN AND ANTHONY P. ALVAREZ.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 158232 -
CaseG.R. No. 198097 - STATUS MARITIME CORPORATION, MS. LOMA B. AGUIMAN, FAIRDEAL GROUP MANAGEMENT S.A., AND MT FAIR JOLLY, VS. SPOUSES MARGARITO B. DELALAMON AND PRISCILA A. DELALAMON.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 198097 -