Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, as recommended by the Court Administrator, respondent Judge Rolando De Guzman is hereby FINED in the amount of One Thousand Pesos (P1,000.00) and is warned that a repetition of the same or similar act shall be dealt with more severely by this Court. SO ORDERED.
WHEREFORE, as recommended by the Court Administrator, respondent Judge Rolando De Guzman is hereby FINED in the amount of One Thousand Pesos (P1,000.00) and is warned that a repetition of the same or similar act shall be dealt with more severely by this Court. SO ORDERED.
A.M. No. MTJ-00-1279 - JUDGE ALICIA GONZALES-DECANO, COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE ORLANDO ANA F. SIAPNO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. No. MTJ-00-1279
CaseA.M. No. 2003-5-SC - VALENTINO V. RUGA, MISO (CASUAL), COMPLAINANT, VS. EDWIN S. LIGOT, SC CHIEF JUDICIAL STAFF OFFICER, MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS OFFICE (MISO), MISO-SDAAD.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. No. 2003-5-SC
CaseA.M. No. RTJ-99-1463 (Formerly OCA IPI 97-456-RTJ) - LORETO T. YU, COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE MATEO M. LEANDA (RET.) REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 8 TACLOBAN CITY.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. No. RTJ-99-1463