TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, IN VIEW OF ALL THE FOREGOING PREMISES , the preponderance of evidence having substantially and sufficiently tilted in favor of the [petitioners] herein and against the [respondents] herein named and their siblings, this Court hereby renders judgment declaring the validity of the 272.33 square meters eastern portion of Lot No.
WHEREFORE, IN VIEW OF ALL THE FOREGOING PREMISES , the preponderance of evidence having substantially and sufficiently tilted in favor of the [petitioners] herein and against the [respondents] herein named and their siblings, this Court hereby renders judgment declaring the validity of the 272.33 square meters eastern portion of Lot No. 1633 in favor of the [petitioners] and, the [respondents] are hereby ordered to do the following: to respect, recognize and not to molest the lawful ownership and possession of the [petitioners] over the 272.33 square meters located at the eastern portion of Lot No. 1633 of the Sarrat Cadastre; to pay jointly and severally to the [petitioners] the total sum of: 2.a. P118,453.50 - as and for actual damages; 2.b. P400,000.00 - as and for moral damages; 2.c. P100,000.00 - as and for nominal damages; 2.d. P200,000.00 - as and for temperate damages; and 2.e. P300,000.00 - as and for exemplary damages or corrective. With costs against the [respondents]. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 132518 - GAVINA MAGLUCOT-AW, CATALINA ORCULLO, RICHARD ESTANO, NIDA MAGLUCOT, MELANIA MAGLUCOT-CATUBIG, EMILIANO CATUBIG, LADISLAO SALMA, VS. LEOPOLDO MAGLUCOT, SEVERO MAGLUCOT, WILFREDA MAGLUCOT-ALEJO AND CONSTANCIO ALEJO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 132518 -
CaseREPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, VS. DAMIAN ERMITAÑO DE GUZMAN, DEOGRACIAS ERMITAÑO DE GUZMAN, ZENAIDA ERMITAÑO DE GUZMAN, ALICIA ERMITAÑO DE GUZMAN, SALVADOR ERMITAÑO DE GUZMAN, DOMINGA ERMITAÑON, NATIVIDAD ENCARNACION, MELBA E. TORRES, FLORA MANALO, SOCORRO DELA ROSA, JOSE ERMITAÑO, ESMERANDO ERMITAÑO
G.R. No. 137887 -