Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, the prosecution having proved the guilt of [Jabalde] beyond reasonable doubt of violation of paragraph (a), Section 10, Article VI of R.A. 7610, as amended, [Jabalde] is Convicted . Appreciating in her favor the mitigating circumstance of passion and obluscation, and applying the provisions of the indeterminate sentence law, [Jabalde] is hereby sentenced to an indeterminate penalty of imprisonment ranging from six (6) months and one (1) day of prision correccional in its minimum perio…
WHEREFORE, the prosecution having proved the guilt of [Jabalde] beyond reasonable doubt of violation of paragraph (a), Section 10, Article VI of R.A. 7610, as amended, [Jabalde] is Convicted . Appreciating in her favor the mitigating circumstance of passion and obluscation, and applying the provisions of the indeterminate sentence law, [Jabalde] is hereby sentenced to an indeterminate penalty of imprisonment ranging from six (6) months and one (1) day of prision correccional in its minimum period, as minimum to six (6) years and one (1) day of prision mayor in its minimum period, as maximum The bond posted for her temporary liberty is hereby ordered release. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 243151 - XXX[1], VS. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 243151 -
CaseG.R. No. 240883 - LUZVIMINDA PASCUA Y BULAN, VS. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 240883 -
CaseG.R. No. 198389 - VIVENCIO ROALLOS Y TRILLANES, VS. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES.RESOLUTION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 198389 -