JurisprudenceG.R. No. 207433 -

G.R. No. 207433 - DR. FE LASAM, VS. PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK AND HON. PRESIDING JUDGE OF REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 66, SAN FERNANDO CITY, LA UNION.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library

View Original Source Compare

TL;DR — Ruling

WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing, the instant petition is hereby DISMISSED for lack of merit. SO ORDERED.

Decision

Ruling

WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing, the instant petition is hereby DISMISSED for lack of merit. SO ORDERED.

Related Cases

Case

G.R. No. 207377 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK, VS. SPOUSES NESTOR AND FELICIDAD VICTOR AND SPOUSES REYNALDO AND GAVINA VICTOR.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

G.R. No. 207377 -

Case

G.R. NO. 162734 - MARIE ANTONETTE ABIGAIL C. SALIENTES, ORLANDO B. SALIENTES, AND ROSARIO C. SALIENTES, VS. LORAN S.D. ABANILLA, HONORABLE JUDGE PEDRO SABUNDAYO, JR., REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 203, MUNTINLUPA CITY.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library

G.R. NO. 162734 -

Case

G.R. No. 235604 - SPOUSES LEONARDO AND MARILYN ANGELES, FOR THEMSELVES AND AS ATTORNEY-IN-FACT OF OLYMPIA C. BERNABE, AURORA ANGELES, PETER A. CARTAGENA, FRANCISCO A. CARTAGENA III, AND MANY PLACES, INC., VS. TRADERS ROYAL BANK (NOW KNOWN AS BANK OF COMMERCE).DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library

G.R. No. 235604 -