TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered in favor of the plaintiff as follows: Ordering the defendants, their assigns, agents or other persons acting for themselves, to vacate the premises in question and to restore possession thereof to the plaintiff; Ordering the defendants to pay the plaintiff jointly and severally, the amount of P500.
WHEREFORE , premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered in favor of the plaintiff as follows: Ordering the defendants, their assigns, agents or other persons acting for themselves, to vacate the premises in question and to restore possession thereof to the plaintiff; Ordering the defendants to pay the plaintiff jointly and severally, the amount of P500.00 a month from date of demand which was on December 18, 2001, until they finally vacate the premises, as reasonable compensation for the use and occupation of the same; Ordering the defendants to pay the plaintiff, jointly and severally, the amount of P5,000.00 as attorney's fees and to pay the costs of suit. SO ORDERED.
AS REPRESENTED BY NESTOR MONTERO, AND THE OTHER HEIRS OF GASPAR MONTERO, NAMELY, WILSON MONTERO, SYLVIA LEWIS AND DONATO MONTERO, VS. NICANOR PADILLA III
G.R. No. 228417 -
CaseG.R. NO. 147939 - THE HEIRS OF CRISTETA DE LA ROSA, VS. HON. ADELINA CALDERON- BARGAS, HEIRS OF SESINANDO MILLARE, ROSALINA M. COSEP, CARMELITA M. DAMASO,` MERCEDES M. ESPIRITU, AND FELICITA M. SAN FELIPE.
G.R. NO. 147939 -
CaseG.R. NO. 162084 - APRIL MARTINEZ, FRITZ DANIEL MARTINEZ AND MARIA OLIVIA MARTINEZ, VS. RODOLFO G. MARTINEZ.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 162084 -