Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE PREMISES CONSIDERED, it is most respectfully recommended that the request of complainant Priscilla B. Villanueva for the preventive suspension of the respondents be GRANTED . In accordance with Section 24, R.A.
WHEREFORE PREMISES CONSIDERED, it is most respectfully recommended that the request of complainant Priscilla B. Villanueva for the preventive suspension of the respondents be GRANTED . In accordance with Section 24, R.A. No. 6770 and Section 9, Rule III of Administrative Order No. 07, respondents RICARDO EVANGELISTA, CONCEPCION MELICAN and GRACE LIMOS are hereby PREVENTIVELY SUSPENDED during the pendency of the case until termination, but not to exceed the total period of four (4) months, without pay. In case of delay in the disposition of the case due to the fault, negligence or any cause attributable to the respondents, the period of such delay shall not be counted in computing the period of the preventive suspension. In accordance with Section 27, par. (1), R.A. No. 6770, this Order is immediately executory. Notwithstanding any motion, appeal or petition that may be filed by the respondents seeking relief from this Order, unless otherwise ordered by this Office or by any court of competent jurisdiction, the implementation of this Order shall be interrupted within the period prescribed. The Honorable Secretary of the Interior and Local Government and Department of Finance are hereby directed to implement this Order immediately upon receipt hereof, and to notify this Office within five (5) days from said receipt of the status of said implementation. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 164250 - OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN AND DENNIS M. VILLA-IGNACIO, IN HIS CAPACITY AS SPECIAL PROSECUTOR, OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, VS. ATTY. GIL A. VALERA AND COURT OF APPEALS (SPECIAL FIRST DIVISION). D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 164250 -
CaseGOVERNOR ENRIQUE T. GARCIA, JR., AURELIO C. ANGELES, JR., EMERLINDA S. TALENTO AND RODOLFO H. DE MESA, VS. COURT OF APPEALS 12
G.R. No. 185132 -
CaseOFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, VS. PRISCILLA S. CORDOVA, DEPUTY COLLECTOR FOR ASSESSMENT, BUREAU OF CUSTOMS.
G.R. No. 188650 -