Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, premises considered, JUDGMENT IS HEREBY RENDERED IN FAVOR OF THE PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST THE DEFENDANT ordering the latter to pay Plaintiff as follows: The sum of P1,161,933.27 representing the costs of the elevator parts used, and for services and maintenance, with legal rate of interest from the filing of the complaint; The sum of P50,000.00 as attorney's fees; The costs of suit. SO ORDERED.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, JUDGMENT IS HEREBY RENDERED IN FAVOR OF THE PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST THE DEFENDANT ordering the latter to pay Plaintiff as follows: The sum of P1,161,933.27 representing the costs of the elevator parts used, and for services and maintenance, with legal rate of interest from the filing of the complaint; The sum of P50,000.00 as attorney's fees; The costs of suit. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 167942 - ASIAN CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, VS. CATHAY PACIFIC STEEL CORPORATION, (CAPASCO).D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 167942 -
CaseG.R. No. 173155 - R.S. TOMAS, INC., VS. RIZAL CEMENT COMPANY, INC..D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 173155 -
CaseG.R. No. 165679 - ENGR. APOLINARIO DUEÑAS, VS. ALICE GUCE-AFRICA.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 165679 -