Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , foregoing premises considered, respondent Atty. FELIPE GOJAR is hereby REPRIMANDED with a warning that any repetition of the same shall be dealt with more severely. SO ORDERED.
WHEREFORE , foregoing premises considered, respondent Atty. FELIPE GOJAR is hereby REPRIMANDED with a warning that any repetition of the same shall be dealt with more severely. SO ORDERED.
A.M. NO. P-07-2401 (FORMERLY OCA IPI NO. 07-2581-P) - CLERK OF COURT MARICRIS GILLAMAC-ORTIZ, COMPLAINANT, VS. SHERIFF ARCHIMEDES D. ALMEIDA, JR..R E S O L U T I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. NO. P-07-2401
CaseA.C. No. 8111 - ADELITA S. VILLAMOR, COMPLAINANT, VS. ATTY. ELY GALLAND A. JUMAO-AS.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
A.C. No. 8111
CaseA.C. No. 10679 - PO1 JOSE B. CASPE, COMPLAINANT, VS. ATTY. AQUILINO A. MEJICA.R E S O L U T I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.C. No. 10679