Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of merit and the judgment dated January 8, 2003 of the Regional Trial Court of Baguio City in Civil Case No. 4140-R is AFFIRMED in toto. SO ORDERED.
WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of merit and the judgment dated January 8, 2003 of the Regional Trial Court of Baguio City in Civil Case No. 4140-R is AFFIRMED in toto. SO ORDERED.
G.R. NO. 149749 - AGAPITA DIAZ, VS. COURT OF APPEALS; HEIRS OF SHERLY MONEÑO,[1] MAMERTA C. MONEÑO, JASPHIN M. VILLAMIL, WHELHELMIA M. DECARO, EDDIE MONEÑO, GININA M. DAQUIPIL, FERNAN C. MONEÑO, ARLENE C. MONEÑO, RICHARD C. MONEÑO AND NIKKI C. MONEÑO, REPRESENTED BY EDDIE C. MONEÑO; TEODORO LANTORIA
G.R. NO. 149749 -
CaseG.R. No. 131520 - ESTELITA AGUIRRE, VS. THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS AND PRIVADO TUPAS AND TEOFISTA TUPAS (DECEASED) SUBSTITUTED BY ROGELIA TUPAS-BARBERS, FRANCISCO SACAPAÑO, PATERNO SACAPAÑO, GLORIA SACAPAÑO SAMAR, PRODITO SACAPAÑO AND JOSEBEL SACAPAÑO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 131520 -
CaseG.R. NO. 158380 - MARIQUITA MACAPAGAL, VS. CATALINA O. REMORIN, CORAZON CALUZA-BAMRUNGCHEEP, AND LAURELIA CALUZA-VALENCIANO. DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 158380 -