TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, in the light of the foregoing, the Court hereby renders judgment in favor of the Plaintiffs Pedro Buquel, Santiago Buquel, Jr., Rosalinda Buquel, and Francisco Buquel as against Defendants Camilo Sibal and Tobi Mangoba ordering: 1 .The restoration to Plaintiffs of their peaceful possession of the land in question, specifically on the share of Santiago Buquel, Jr.; 2.
WHEREFORE, in the light of the foregoing, the Court hereby renders judgment in favor of the Plaintiffs Pedro Buquel, Santiago Buquel, Jr., Rosalinda Buquel, and Francisco Buquel as against Defendants Camilo Sibal and Tobi Mangoba ordering: 1 .The restoration to Plaintiffs of their peaceful possession of the land in question, specifically on the share of Santiago Buquel, Jr.; 2. The Defendants to pay the plaintiffs the amount of Fen Thousand Pesos for Attorney's Fees; and 3. The Defendants to pay to the .Plaintiffs the amount of Fifteen Thousand Pesos as moral and actual damages. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 194818 - CHARLES BUMAGAT, JULIAN BACUDIO, ROSARIO PADRE, SPOUSES ROGELIO AND ZOSIMA PADRE, AND FELIPE DOMINCIL, VS. REGALADO ARRIBAY.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 194818 -
CaseG.R. No. 250159 - SUSANA BARCELO, CATHERINE B. FLORES, CLARIZA B. BIATO, CHESCA B. MACAPAGAL, CARLO BARCELO AND CAMILLE BARCELO, REPRESENTED BY THEIR ATTORNEY-IN-FACT SUSANA BARCELO, VS. DOMINADOR RIPARIP, ROMEO RIPARIP, ROMEO RIPARIP, JR., AND DANILO TAMALLANA. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Lib
G.R. No. 250159 -
CaseG.R. No. 165423 - NILO PADRE, VS. FRUCTOSA BADILLO, FEDILA BADILLO, PRESENTACION CABALLES, EDWINA VICARIO (D) REPRESENTED BY MARY JOY VICARIO-ORBETA AND NELSON BADILLO. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 165423 -