Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , premises considered, we hereby GRANT the present petition for review on certiorari and REVERSE and SET ASIDE the resolutions dated May 4, 2012, and July 12, 2012, of the Court of Appeals, Cagayan de Oro City, in CA-G.R. SP No. 04425-MIN.
WHEREFORE , premises considered, we hereby GRANT the present petition for review on certiorari and REVERSE and SET ASIDE the resolutions dated May 4, 2012, and July 12, 2012, of the Court of Appeals, Cagayan de Oro City, in CA-G.R. SP No. 04425-MIN. The CA is ordered to admit the Compliance dated June 7, 2012, filed by the petitioners, reinstate the petitioners' Petition for Review, and to decide with dispatch the present case on its merits. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 199628 -
G.R. No. 199628 -
CaseG.R. No. 205250 - LORRAINE D. BARRA, VS. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION. R E S O L U T I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 205250 -
CaseG.R. No. 262831 - GIANNI DE MUNARI, VS. THELMA GAGUI ASPREC ALSO KNOWN AS THELMA DE MUNARI, THELMA PICOTTO AND THELMA CENTENO AND THE CIVIL REGISTRAR GENERAL.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 262831 -