Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, premises considered, this court finds the preponderance of evidence in favor of the defendants and so holds that the complaint of plaintiffs states no cause of action, in consequence, hereby renders judgment: "1. Dismissing plaintiffs' complaint; "2. Ordering the plaintiffs to pay the defendants the following: "a) P3,000.00 as attorney's fees; and "b) P2,000.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, this court finds the preponderance of evidence in favor of the defendants and so holds that the complaint of plaintiffs states no cause of action, in consequence, hereby renders judgment: "1. Dismissing plaintiffs' complaint; "2. Ordering the plaintiffs to pay the defendants the following: "a) P3,000.00 as attorney's fees; and "b) P2,000.00 as actual and legal expenses. "SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 175720 - CRESENCIANA TUBO RODRIGUEZ (NOW DECEASED), SUBSTITUTED BY SUSANA A. LLAGAS, VS. EVANGELINE RODRIGUEZ, BELEN RODRIGUEZ AND BUENAVENTURA RODRIGUEZ,D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 175720 -
CaseG.R. No. 127382 - DR. JESUS SERIÑA AND ENRIQUETA SERIÑA (DECEASED), REPRESENTED BY DR. JESUS SERIÑA, JR., ANTONIO SERIÑA, VIOLETA SERIÑA TAN, REYNALDO SERIÑA AND EMMANUEL SERIÑA, VS. VICTOR CABALLERO, TEODORO DONELA, OLIVER DONELA, COURT OF APPEALS, AND THE HONORABLE REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 20,
G.R. No. 127382 -
CaseG.R. No. 211687 - SPOUSES EUGENIO DE VERA AND ROSALIA[1] PADILLA, VS. FAUSTA CATUNGAL, SUBSTITUTED BY HER HEIRS, NAMELY: GAUDENCIO G. DIAZ, SR., ALFONSO C. DIAZ, AND LOURDES C. LOPEZ.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 211687 -