G.R. No. 157371 - ELMER G. ANDAYA, VS. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION,* INTERNATIONAL HAM & SAUSAGE MANUFACTURING CO., INC..DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library

Ruling

WHEREFORE, foregoing premises considered, this petition is dismissed for lack of merit." [4] The CA denied petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration via its February 27, 2003 Resolution. The Facts The antecedents were summarized by the appellate court as follows: "This case arose from a complaint for illegal dismissal and money claims filed by Noli Paligutan, Exequiel Tabiosas and petitioner Elmer Andaya. After the contending parties have filed their respective position papers and their respective reply position papers, a decision was rendered on June 14, 2000, with the following dispositive portion: "WHEREFORE, premises considered, respondent is directed to pay the complainants their S/L, holiday pay, overtime pay, to wit: (1) Elmer Andaya SILP (2/5/96-2/5/99) P195.33 x 5 x 3 yrs.=P2,929.95 HOLIDAY PAY (1/20/96-2/28/99)=30 days P195.33 x 30 days=P5,859.90 OT (2/5/96-2/5/99)=36 P195.33/8=P24.40 x 1.25 =P30.52 x 4 hrs x 28 x 26= P123,056.64=P131,846.49 (2) NOLI PALIGUTAN=P131,846.49 - P45,000.00 (3) EXEQUIEL TABIOSAS SILP (1/20/96-1/30/99) 3 yrs. P226 x 5 x 3=P3,390.00 HOLIDAY PAY (1/20/96-1/20/99)=30 days P226 x 30 days=P6,780.00 OT (1/20/96-1/30/99)=36 P226/8=P28.25 x 1.25 x 4 hrs x 28 x 26=P142,380.00= P152,550.00 "The rest of the claims and causes of action are dismissed. "SO ORDERED.