Back to Search
JurisprudenceG.R. No. 220647 -

G.R. No. 220647 - NOLI D. APARICIO AND RENAN CLARITO, VS. MANILA BROADCASTING COMPANY.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

Cited Laws

RA 46,
Share:

TL;DR — Ruling

WHEREFORE, premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered declaring complainants to have been illegally dismissed from the service. As such, respondent Manila Broadcasting Company is hereby ordered to pay complainants their [backwages] and separation pay, to wit: NAME BACKWAGES SEPARATION PAY 1. Noli [Aparicio] P427,209.32 P1,776.

Decision

Ruling

WHEREFORE, premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered declaring complainants to have been illegally dismissed from the service. As such, respondent Manila Broadcasting Company is hereby ordered to pay complainants their [backwages] and separation pay, to wit: NAME BACKWAGES SEPARATION PAY 1. Noli [Aparicio] P427,209.32 P1,776.56 2. Renan Clarito P357,068.36 P15,333.79 3. Noel Solutan P427,026.44 P(10,423.09) 4. Delmer Dilig P427,238.27 P49,194.36 5. Abelardo Brillantes P357,068.36 P(25,239.84) Respondent is further ordered to pay the sum equivalent to ten percent of the judgment award as attorney's fees. All other claims are ordered dismissed for lack of merit and/or by reason of settlement. SO ORDERED.