Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, the petition is DENIED. The resolution in NLRC CA No. 010520-96 is AFFIRMED with the following modifications: 1) The private respondents can not be reinstated, due to their acceptance of the separation pay offered by the petitioner; 2) The private respondents are entitled to their full back wages; and, 3) The amount of the separation pay received by private respondents from petitioner shall not be deducted from their full back wages. Costs against petitioner.
WHEREFORE, the petition is DENIED. The resolution in NLRC CA No. 010520-96 is AFFIRMED with the following modifications: 1) The private respondents can not be reinstated, due to their acceptance of the separation pay offered by the petitioner; 2) The private respondents are entitled to their full back wages; and, 3) The amount of the separation pay received by private respondents from petitioner shall not be deducted from their full back wages. Costs against petitioner. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 151966 - JPL MARKETING PROMOTIONS, VS. COURT OF APPEALS, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, NOEL GONZALES, RAMON ABESA III AND FAUSTINO ANINIPOT.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 151966 -
CaseG.R. No. 120556 - HDA. DAPDAP I AND/OR LUMBIA AGRICULTURAL AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, VS. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION AND NATIONAL FEDERATION OF SUGAR WORKERS FOOD AND GENERAL TRADES (NFSW-FGT)/PEDRO BARRIENTOS JR.. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 120556 -
CaseG.R. No. 110017 -
G.R. No. 110017 -