Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , the petition for review on certiorari is hereby DENIED for lack of merit. Likewise, petitioner’s motions for extension of time to file memorandum dated November 8, November 23, and December 8, 2004, being the 8th, 9th and 10th such motions, respectively, are hereby DENIED. Costs against petitioner. SO ORDERED.
WHEREFORE , the petition for review on certiorari is hereby DENIED for lack of merit. Likewise, petitioners motions for extension of time to file memorandum dated November 8, November 23, and December 8, 2004, being the 8th, 9th and 10th such motions, respectively, are hereby DENIED. Costs against petitioner. SO ORDERED.
G.R. NO. 142420 - PHILIPPINE BANK OF COMMUNICATIONS, VS. DIAMOND SEAFOODS CORPORATION, ROMEO V. JACINTO, FRANCISCO YU & SHEOLIN YU.
G.R. NO. 142420 -
CaseG.R. No. 162894 - RAYTHEON INTERNATIONAL, INC., vs. STOCKTON W. ROUZIE, JR..D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 162894 -
CaseG.R. No. 175787 - PHILLIPS SEAFOOD (PHILIPPINES) CORPORATION, VS. THE BOARD OF INVESTMENTS.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 175787 -