Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, respondents Rolando B. Zoleta and Elias B. Caputolan, Jr. are found GUILTY of Grave Misconduct, Serious Dishonesty and [sic] Conduct Prejudicial to the Best Interest of the Service, and are meted the penalty of Dismissal from the Service, together with its accessory penalties.
WHEREFORE, respondents Rolando B. Zoleta and Elias B. Caputolan, Jr. are found GUILTY of Grave Misconduct, Serious Dishonesty and [sic] Conduct Prejudicial to the Best Interest of the Service, and are meted the penalty of Dismissal from the Service, together with its accessory penalties. In the event that the penalty of Dismissal can no longer be enforced due to respondents' separation from the service, the same shall be converted into a Fine in the amount equivalent to their salary for one (1) year, payable to the Office of the Ombudsman, and may be deductible from their retirement benefits, accrued leave credits or any receivables by respondents from their office. It shall be understood that the accessory penalties attached to the principal penalty of Dismissal shall continue to be imposed. 1aшphi1 SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 253186 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, VS. WU JIAN CAI AND JIANG HUO ZAO, ACCUSED, CHEN JUNYUE, ACCUSED-.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 253186 -
CaseG.R. No. 195905 -
G.R. No. 195905 -
CaseG.R. No. 261472 - NATIONAL FOOD AUTHORITY, REPRESENTED BY ATTY. MA. THERESA S. VILLAFUERTE, CPA, IN HER CAPACITY AS DEPARTMENT MANAGER OF NFA LEGAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, VS. CITY GOVERNMENT OF TAGUM, CITY ASSESSOR AND CITY TREASURER OF TAGUM, PROVINCE OF DAVAO DEL NORTE.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court
G.R. No. 261472 -