Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, premises considered, this Resolution is hereby issued setting aside with FINALITY the Order dated March 22, 1994 of the Regional Director of DAR Region III. The records of this case is remanded to the Regional Office for immediate implementation of the Order dated January 16, 1992 of this office as affirmed by the Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court. SO ORDERED.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, this Resolution is hereby issued setting aside with FINALITY the Order dated March 22, 1994 of the Regional Director of DAR Region III. The records of this case is remanded to the Regional Office for immediate implementation of the Order dated January 16, 1992 of this office as affirmed by the Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court. SO ORDERED.
HEIRS OF TEODORO CADELIÑA, REPRESENTED BY SOLEDAD CADIZ VDA. DE CADELIÑA, VS. FRANCISCO CADIZ, CELESTINO DELA CRUZ, ANTONIO VICTORIA, HEIRS OF TELESFORO VILLAR REPRESENTED BY SAMUEL VILLAR, FRANCISCO VICTORIA AND MAGNO GANTE;
G.R. No. 194417 -
CaseG.R. No. 235086 - DEPARTMENT OF AGRARIAN REFORM, VS. JUSTINIANA ITLIONG, DAVID C. DAKANAY AND THE OTHER LEGITIMATE CHILDREN OF THE LATE LOURDES CADIZ DAKANAY.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 235086 -
CaseG.R. No. 174034 - HEIRS OF MARILOU K. SANTIAGO, REPRESENTED BY DENNIS K. SANTIAGO, LOURDES K. SANTIAGO AND EUFEMIA K. SANTIAGO, VS. ALFONSO AGUILA.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 174034 -