Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, in the light of the foregoing, this Commission hereby resolves to GRANT this Petition and DISQUALIFY Respondent Cesar B. Sulong to run for Municipal mayor for Lapuyan, Zamboanga del Sur in the May 14, 2001 Elections in violation of Section 40[b] of the Local Government Code. [7] Respondent Sulong filed a motion for reconsideration citing a certification, dated August 7, 2001, of Provincial Secretary of Zamboanga del Sur (OIC) Wilfredo Cimafranca that the decision in AC No.
WHEREFORE, in the light of the foregoing, this Commission hereby resolves to GRANT this Petition and DISQUALIFY Respondent Cesar B. Sulong to run for Municipal mayor for Lapuyan, Zamboanga del Sur in the May 14, 2001 Elections in violation of Section 40[b] of the Local Government Code. [7] Respondent Sulong filed a motion for reconsideration citing a certification, dated August 7, 2001, of Provincial Secretary of Zamboanga del Sur (OIC) Wilfredo Cimafranca that the decision in AC No. 12-91 has not become final and executory as the final disposition thereof was overtaken by the local elections of May 1992. He reiterated his claim that at no time had he been removed by virtue of the said decision. [8] Petitioner filed an opposition contending, among other things, that the fact that Zamboanga del Sur Governor Ariosa had ordered the enforcement of the decision signified that respondent Sulongs motion for reconsideration and/or notice of appeal had not been given due course by the Sangguniang Panlalawigan; and that respondent Sulongs claim that he had not been removed from office was belied by the fact that he (respondent Sulong) brought charges against Vicente Imbing for Usurpation of Official Functions (I.S. No. 92-35), in support of which respondent Sulong attested under oath that Imbing had succeeded him as mayor of Lapuyan. [9] In a separate motion, petitioner prayed that the resolution of August 1, 2001 be executed and that he be installed as mayor of Lapuyan in view of private respondents disqualification. On August 30, 2001, the COMELECs First Division denied petitioners motion for execution on the ground that the disqualification of an elected candidate does not entitle the candidate who obtained the second highest number of votes to occupy the office vacated. [10] Petitioner then filed a motion for reconsideration of this order. [11] On April 4, 2002, the COMELEC en banc issued its resolution subject of the petition in this case, reversing the resolution, dated August 1, 2001, of its First Division insofar as it found respondent Sulong disqualified from running as mayor. It held: The only issue in this case is whether or not the foregoing decision [in AC No. 12-91], assuming it has become final and executory, constitutes a ground for the disqualification of herein respondent-movant as a candidate in the elections [of May 14, 2001]. The records of the case reveal that the decision of the Sangguniang Panlalawigan was promulgated on February [4] , 1992 finding respondent Sulong guilty of dishonesty, falsification of public documents, malversation. . . In the May 1992 elections, respondent Sulong was re-elected mayor of Lapuyan, Zamboanga del Sur despite the decision of the Sangguniang dismissing him from office. In the 1995 May elections, respondent Sulong ran and won the mayoralty elections of Lapuyan, Zamboanga del Sur. While it is true that one of the disqualifications from running in an elective position is removal from office as a
JULIUS O. GARCIA, VS. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, AND RENATO U. REYES.
G.R. No. 120905 -
CaseG.R. No. 157526 - EMILIANA TORAL KARE, VS. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS. [G.R. NO. 157527.] SALVADOR K. MOLL, VS. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 157526 -
CaseG.R. No. 263828 - AVELINO C. AMANGYEN, VS. THE COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS AND FRANKLIN W. TALAWEC.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 263828 -