Back to Search
JurisprudenceG.R. No. 112625 -

G.R. No. 112625 - CMH AGRICULTURAL CORPORATION, CARLOS M. HOJILLA, CESAR M. HOJILLA, CLAUDIO M. HOJILLA, CORA M. HOJILLA AND CORNELIO M. HOJILLA, VS. HON. COURT OF APPEALS AND CRISTOBAL M. HOJILLA.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

Cited Laws

RA 343,RA 275,RA 483,RA 452,RA 9,RA 660,RA 49,RA 273,RA 758,RA 465,RA 548,
Share:

TL;DR — Ruling

WHEREFORE, the assailed Decision dated October 25, 1993 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 28893 holding that the RTC of Bacolod City, Branch 45, did not commit grave abuse of discretion in reconsidering its Order, dated November 22, 1991, in Civil Case No.

Decision

Ruling

WHEREFORE, the assailed Decision dated October 25, 1993 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 28893 holding that the RTC of Bacolod City, Branch 45, did not commit grave abuse of discretion in reconsidering its Order, dated November 22, 1991, in Civil Case No. 6256 is AFFIRMED . The Regional Trial Court of Bacolod City, Branch 45, is hereby ordered to resume forthwith the trial of Civil Case No. 6256 and to resolve the same with utmost dispatch. SO ORDERED.