Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, in view of all the foregoing premises, judgment is hereby rendered - Ordering the defendant to pay plaintiff the total sum of P9,082,068.00 representing the balance of the contract price for Phase III of the project, the 10% retention for Phases I, II and III of the project, and the contract price for Phase IV of the project; Ordering the defendant to indemnify plaintiff the sum equal to two (2%) per centum of P9,082,068.
WHEREFORE, in view of all the foregoing premises, judgment is hereby rendered - Ordering the defendant to pay plaintiff the total sum of P9,082,068.00 representing the balance of the contract price for Phase III of the project, the 10% retention for Phases I, II and III of the project, and the contract price for Phase IV of the project; Ordering the defendant to indemnify plaintiff the sum equal to two (2%) per centum of P9,082,068.00 monthly from date of the filing of the complaint up to March 30, 1995, as actual and for damages; Ordering the defendant to indemnify plaintiff the sum equal to 1 and ½% per cent of P9,082.068.00 monthly from March 30, 1995 up to the time the full amount is fully paid, as and by way of actual damages; The sum of P1,000,000.00 as and for attorney's fee; plus the costs of the suit. The counterclaim interposed by the defendant is hereby dismissed for lack of evidence to sustain it. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 165548 - PHILIPPINE REALTY AND HOLDINGS CORPORATION, VS. LEY CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION. [G. R. No. 167879] LEY CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, VS. PHILIPPINE REALTY AND HOLDINGS CORPORATION. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 165548 -
CaseG.R. No. 143273 - RISER AIRCONDITIONING SERVICES CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY FERNANDO C. RAYMUNDO, VS. CONFIELD CONSTRUCTION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 143273 -
CaseG.R. NO. 163915 - ASIAN CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, VS. COMFAC CORPORATION.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 163915 -