Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , the administrative complaint against respondent Judge Fatima G. Asdala is hereby DISMISSED for lack of merit. The countercharges against complainant are also dismissed. SO ORDERED.
WHEREFORE , the administrative complaint against respondent Judge Fatima G. Asdala is hereby DISMISSED for lack of merit. The countercharges against complainant are also dismissed. SO ORDERED.
A.M. NO. RTJ-06-2008 [OCA-IPI NO. 05-2229-RTJ] - ATTY. ROMEO G. ROXAS, COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE ANTONIO N. EUGENIO, JR., REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 24, MANILA.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. NO. RTJ-06-2008
CaseA.M. No. RTJ-04-1856 (Formerly OCA IPI No. 03-1750-RTJ) - LORETO JOAQUIN, VS. JUDGE FE ALBANO MADRID, PRESIDING JUDGE, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT SECOND JUDICIAL REGION BRANCH 21, SANTIAGO CITY. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. No. RTJ-04-1856
CaseANA MARIA C. MANGUERRA, COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE GALICANO C. ARRIESGADO, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 18, CEBU CITY; JUDGE ANACLETO L. CAMINADE, RTC, BRANCH 6, CEBU CITY; CLERK OF COURT VII JEOFFREY S. JOAQUINO, RTC-OCC, CEBU CITY; AND BRANCH CLERK OF COURT MYRNA V. LIMBAGA, RTC, BRANCH 6, CEBU CITY.
A.M. No. RTJ-04-1854