Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, the decision appealed from is hereby ANNULLED and SET ASIDE and judgment is hereby rendered: 1. Declaring the dismissal of complainant to be without any just or authorized cause and, therefore, illegal; 2. Ordering respondent San Miguel Corporation to reinstate the complainant to his former or equivalent position without loss of seniority rights and other privileges, and with full backwages from March 16, 1992 up to the time of his actual reinstatement.
WHEREFORE, the decision appealed from is hereby ANNULLED and SET ASIDE and judgment is hereby rendered: 1. Declaring the dismissal of complainant to be without any just or authorized cause and, therefore, illegal; 2. Ordering respondent San Miguel Corporation to reinstate the complainant to his former or equivalent position without loss of seniority rights and other privileges, and with full backwages from March 16, 1992 up to the time of his actual reinstatement. However, should reinstatement be no longer possible due to some valid reasons, respondent San Miguel Corporation is ordered to pay the complainant separation pay of one (1) month pay for every year of service, in addition to complainant's full backwages; 3. Ordering respondent San Miguel Corporation to pay complainant moral damages of P300,000.00 and exemplary damages of P150,000.00, plus ten (10%) percent of the total monetary awards, as attorney's fees. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 186243 - HACIENDA PRIMERA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION and ANNA KATRINA E. HERNANDEZ, vs. MICHAEL S. VILLEGAS.RESOLUTION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 186243 -
CaseG.R. No. 118432 - CONRADO COSICO, JR., VS. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, EVA AIRWAYS CORPORATION, LEWIS CHANG, AND ALLEN SOONG.
G.R. No. 118432 -
CaseG.R. NO. 148261 - NENUCA A. VELEZ, VS. SHANGRI-LA'S EDSA PLAZA HOTEL, TERRY KO, COEN MASSELINK AND VANESSA SUATENGCO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 148261 -