Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, premises considered, the appeal of complainant is hereby GRANTED. The Decision dated 25 April 2006 of Executive Labor Arbiter Violeta Bantug is REVERSED and SET ASIDE. Another one is entered declaring that the dismissal of complainant was illegal. Respondent Philippine Spring Water Resources, Inc.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, the appeal of complainant is hereby GRANTED. The Decision dated 25 April 2006 of Executive Labor Arbiter Violeta Bantug is REVERSED and SET ASIDE. Another one is entered declaring that the dismissal of complainant was illegal. Respondent Philippine Spring Water Resources, Inc. is then directed to pay complainants separation pay of Fifteen Thousand (P15,000.00) plus backwages, inclusive of salary and 0,25% commission on cash on delivery from February 1, 2005 up to the finality of the Decision. In addition, respondent should pay complainant of moral and exemplary damages in the amount of P100,000.00. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 164652 - THELMA DUMPIT-MURILLO, VS. COURT OF APPEALS, ASSOCIATED BROADCASTING COMPANY, JOSE JAVIER AND EDWARD TAN.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 164652 -
CaseG.R. No. 155178 - SAN MIGUEL CORPORATION, VS. ANGEL C. PONTILLAS. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 155178 -
CaseG.R. No. 192571 - ABBOTT LABORATORIES, PHILIPPINES, CECILLE A. TERRIBLE, EDWIN D. FEIST, MARIA OLIVIA T. YABUT-MISA, TERESITA C. BERNARDO, AND ALLAN G. ALMAZAR, VS. PEARLIE ANN F. ALCARAZ.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 192571 -