Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, the foregoing premises considered, respondent CELSO R. SANTIAGO, Barangay Chairman of Barangay 183, Zone 16 of the Second District of Manila is hereby found GUILTY of the administrative offenses of DISHONESTY, GRAVE MISCONDUCT and CONDUCT PREJUDICIAL TO THE BEST INTEREST OF THE SERVICE with the penalty of DISMISSAL FROM THE SERVICE pursuant to the pertinent provision of Republic Act No. 6770, otherwise known as the Ombudsman Act of 1989.
WHEREFORE, the foregoing premises considered, respondent CELSO R. SANTIAGO, Barangay Chairman of Barangay 183, Zone 16 of the Second District of Manila is hereby found GUILTY of the administrative offenses of DISHONESTY, GRAVE MISCONDUCT and CONDUCT PREJUDICIAL TO THE BEST INTEREST OF THE SERVICE with the penalty of DISMISSAL FROM THE SERVICE pursuant to the pertinent provision of Republic Act No. 6770, otherwise known as the Ombudsman Act of 1989. The City Mayor of Manila is hereby directed to immediately implement this DECISION in accordance with law and to inform this office of its initial action within fifteen (15) days upon receipt hereof. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 168039 - OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, VS. FERNANDO J. BELTRAN. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 168039 -
CaseG.R. No. 248819 - GRACE CRISILDA A. PANTALEON, VS. OMBUDSMAN-MINDANAO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 248819 -
CaseA.M. No. P-09-2660 - FRANCISCO C. TAGUINOD, COMPLAINANT, VS. DEPUTY SHERIFF ROLANDO TOMAS, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 21, SANTIAGO CITY.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. No. P-09-2660