G.R. No. 237620 -

Ruling

Accordingly, it ordered the issuance of warrants of arrest against them. [26] On February 18 and 19, 2013, petitioners posted bail for their temporary liberty. [27] On February 22, 2013, petitioners filed a Very Urgent Motion for Reconsideration of the Judicial Determination of Probable Cause with Motion to Suspend the Proceedings and to Recall Warrants of Arrest. On March 8, 2013, prior to the resolution of petitioners' Very Urgent Motion, petitioners filed an Ad Cautelam Motion to Quash (the Informations). [28] The RTC then set the arraignment of petitioners on May 7, 2013. [29] The Ruling of the RTC On April 16, 2013, the RTC issued an Order [30] denying both motions of petitioners, to wit: WHEREFORE, in the light of all the foregoing considerations, the "Very Urgent Motion for Reconsideration of the Judicial Determination of Probable Cause with Motion to Suspend Proceedings, and to recall Warrants of Arrest, and the Ad Cautelam Motion to Quash, both filed by the accused are hereby DENIED. The arraignment of he accused set on May 7, 2013 at 8:30 am shall proceed as scheduled. SO ORDERED.