G.R. Nos. 210220-21 - EDWARD THOMAS F. JOSON, VS. THE OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, GOV. AURELIO M. UMALI, ALEJANDRO R. ABESAMIS, EDILBERTO M. PANCHO, MA. CHRISTINA G. ROXAS, AND FERDINAND R. ABESAMIS.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

Ruling

WHEREFORE, premises considered, it is respectfully recommended that: The criminal charges for Violation of Section 3(e) of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act and for Unlawful Appointments against respondents Aurelio M. Umali, Alejandro R. Abesamis, Ferdinand R. Abesamis, Edilberto Pancho and Ma. Cristina G. Roxas be DISMISSED for lack of sufficient evidence; and The administrative charges for Grave Misconduct against respondents Aurelio M. Umali, Alejandro R. Abesamis, Ferdinand R. Abesamis, Edilberto Pancho and Ma. Cristina G. Roxas be DISMISSED for lack of merit. SO RESOLVED. [12] Joson moved for reconsideration of the joint resolution, but his motion was denied by the Ombudsman in its September 23, 2013 Joint Order. It decreed: WHEREFORE, the Motion for Reconsideration is hereby DENIED. The JOINT RESOLUTION dated September 8, 2011 DISMISSING OMB-L-C-O8-O315-D and OMB-L-A-O8-O245-D STANDS. SO ORDERED.