JurisprudenceG.R. NO. 136207 -

HEIRS OF THE LATE FLOR TUNGPALAN, NAMELY, LEONILA VDA. DE TUNGPALAN, EFREN G. TUNGPALAN, VIOLA G. TUNGPALAN, OFELIA TUNGPALAN DUENAS, LAURO G. TUNGPALAN, ROLANDO G. TUNGPALAN, ARACELI G. TUNGPALAN AND RUBEN G. TUNGPALAN, VS. THE COURT OF APPEALS AND SPOUSES NAVARRO R. EUSTAQUIO AND ARABELLA K. EUSTA

Cited Laws

RA 172RA 36RA 67RA 695

TL;DR — Ruling

WHEREFORE , the instant petition is DENIED for lack of merit. The challenged Decision of the Court of Appeals is AFFIRMED. Costs against petitioners. SO ORDERED.

Decision

Ruling

WHEREFORE , the instant petition is DENIED for lack of merit. The challenged Decision of the Court of Appeals is AFFIRMED. Costs against petitioners. SO ORDERED.

Related Cases

Case

G.R. NO. 168155 - HEIRS OF MARINA C. REGALADO AND HEIRS OF ARNULFO C. REGALADO, REPRESENTED BY AMADEO C. REGALADO, VS. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES.

G.R. NO. 168155 -

Case

G.R. No. 169711 - HEIRS OF SARAH MARIE PALMA BURGOS, VS. COURT OF APPEALS AND JOHNNY CO Y YU.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

G.R. No. 169711 -

Case

G.R. No. 101115 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, VS. HON. COURT OF APPEALS, EMILIO BAYONA, MAXIMA R. DE SEPE, SPS. ARTURO SEPE AND DOMINICA SIMEON, SPS. ASUNCION SEPE AND AMBROCIO DAGUIO, SPS. DOMINADOR SEPE AND REMEDIOS NEPOMUCENO, SPS. ENRIQUE SEPE AND MAGDALENA SERIAL, MATILDE SEPE, MARIANO SEPE.

G.R. No. 101115 -