Back to Search
JurisprudenceG.R. No. 160554 -

G.R. No. 160554 - FLORANTE VIDAD, SR., ARLENE VIDAD-ABSALON AND FLORANTE VIDAD, JR., VS. ELPIDIO TAYAMEN AND LAUREANA TAYAMEN.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library

Cited Laws

RA 176RA 55,RA 383,RA 317RA 238,RA 360
View Original SourceCompare
Share:

TL;DR — Ruling

WHEREFORE, premises considered judgment is hereby rendered against the plaintiff and in favor of the defendant ordering the DISMISSAL of this Complaint for want of merit. The counterclaim is likewise DISMISSED for lack of merit. SO ORDERED.

Decision

Ruling

WHEREFORE, premises considered judgment is hereby rendered against the plaintiff and in favor of the defendant ordering the DISMISSAL of this Complaint for want of merit. The counterclaim is likewise DISMISSED for lack of merit. SO ORDERED.

Related Cases

Case

(BOTH DECEASED), NAMELY: OLIVER B. SUYAM, MABLE B. SUYAM, CHRISTOPHER B. SUYAM, ABEL B. SUYAM, AND CHESTER B. SUYAM, REPRESENTED BY THEIR ATTORNEY-IN­FACT AND ON HIS OWN BEHALF, TELESFORO B. SUYAM, V. HEIRS OF FELICIANO JULATON @ PONCIANO, NAMELY: LUCINA J. BADUA, SEMEON JULATON, JULIANA J. BUCASAS,

G.R. No. 209081 -

Case

G.R. No. 186550 - ASIAN CATHAY FINANCE AND LEASING CORPORATION, VS. SPOUSES CESARIO GRAVADOR AND NORMA DE VERA AND SPOUSES EMMA CONCEPCION G. DUMIGPI AND FEDERICO L. DUMIGPI. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

G.R. No. 186550 -

Case

G.R. No. 164695 - HEIRS OF JOSE BARREDO, NAMELY, LOLITA BARREDO, ANNALIZA BARREDO AND MARICHU BARREDO-EPE, REPRESENTED BY MARICHU BARREDO-EPE, VS. LAVOISER BESAÑES.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

G.R. No. 164695 -