Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , premises considered, both parties' appeals are partly granted. The Executive Labor Arbiter's assailed Decision in the above-entitled case is hereby AFFIRMED with MODIFICATION . The Executive Labor Arbiter's finding that Complainant was illegally dismissed from his employment is hereby AFFIRMED .
WHEREFORE , premises considered, both parties' appeals are partly granted. The Executive Labor Arbiter's assailed Decision in the above-entitled case is hereby AFFIRMED with MODIFICATION . The Executive Labor Arbiter's finding that Complainant was illegally dismissed from his employment is hereby AFFIRMED . Respondent is ordered to reinstate Complainant to his former position and to pay him his full backwages, computed from November 22, 2003 up to the time of his actual reinstatement, which, as of September 22, 2007, have already accumulated to P470,305.77. Respondent is further ordered to pay Complainant attorney's fees equivalent to ten percent (10%) of his total monetary award. The award of separation pay is DELETED for lack of legal basis, but the award of 13 th month pay for P8,339.00 and service incentive leave pay for P3,576.92 is AFFIRMED . SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 143709 - CEFERINO P. BUHAIN, VS. THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS, AND SWIFT FOOD, INC..DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 143709 -
CaseG.R. NO. 155037 - ANVIL ENSEMBLES GARMENT, VS. COURT OF APPEALS (FORMER SEVENTEENTH DIVISION), NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION (SECOND DIVISION), HON. CRESENCIO RAMOS, JR., IN HIS CAPACITY AS LABOR ARBITER, AND MELECIO BONABON.
G.R. NO. 155037 -
CaseG.R. No. 175960 - PADILLA MACHINE SHOP, RODOLFO PADILLA and LEONARDO PADILLA, vs., RUFINO A. JAVILGAS. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 175960 -