Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , the instant petition is hereby DISMISSED for failure of the petitioner to show that respondent Commission on Elections acted with grave abuse of discretion in rendering the challenged Resolution dated September 16, 1999 in SPR No. 4-99. Costs against petitioners. SO ORDERED.
WHEREFORE , the instant petition is hereby DISMISSED for failure of the petitioner to show that respondent Commission on Elections acted with grave abuse of discretion in rendering the challenged Resolution dated September 16, 1999 in SPR No. 4-99. Costs against petitioners. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 135423 - JESUS L. CHU, VS. THE COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, THE MUNICIPAL BOARD OF CANVASSERS OF USON, MASBATE AND SALVADORA O. SANCHEZ.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 135423 -
CaseG.R. NO. 172563 - MIKE A. FERMIN, VS. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS AND ALIMUDIN A. MACACUA. DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 172563 -
CaseG.R. No. 144678 - JAVIER E. ZACATE, VS. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS AND THELMA C. BALDADO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 144678 -