Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing considerations, judgment is hereby rendered: (1) declaring that complainant’s employment status with respondent is casual; and (2) dismissing complainant’s charge for illegal dismissal and the money claims for overtime pay, holiday pay, 13th month pay, emergency cost of living allowance, and unpaid wages against respondent for lack of merit. SO ORDERED.
accordingly dismissed his complaint in a decision the dispositive portion of which reads: [1] WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing considerations, judgment is hereby rendered: (1) declaring that complainants employment status with respondent is casual; and (2) dismissing complainants charge for illegal dismissal and the money claims for overtime pay, holiday pay, 13th month pay, emergency cost of living allowance, and unpaid wages against respondent for lack of merit. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 192558 - BITOY JAVIER (DANILO P. JAVIER), VS. FLY ACE CORPORATION/ FLORDELYN CASTILLO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 192558 -
CaseG.R. No. 264881 - COOGEE INTERNATIONAL INC., VS. DAVE B. MANINGO, JUSTINO E. PEREZ, ANTONINO G. QUIRANTE, CHRISTOPHER BRYAN R. MARTE, MIKE G. QUIRANTE, AND MARK KEMUEL B. HERNANDEZ.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 264881 -
CaseG.R. NO. 141168 - ABESCO CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND MR. OSCAR BANZON, GENERAL MANAGER, VS. ALBERTO RAMIREZ, BERNARDO DIWA, MANUEL LOYOLA, REYNALDO P. ACODESIN, ALEXANDER BAUTISTA, EDGAR TAJONERA AND GARY DISON,*. R E S O L U T I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 141168 -