Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered declaring that complainant was illegally dismissed by respondent corporation, and the latter is hereby directed to reinstate complainant to her former position and pay her full backwages and benefits computed below, as follows: A. Backwages September 12, 2001 to October 21, 2002 1. Salaries and Wages P80,000 x 13.30 months = P1,064,000.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered declaring that complainant was illegally dismissed by respondent corporation, and the latter is hereby directed to reinstate complainant to her former position and pay her full backwages and benefits computed below, as follows: A. Backwages September 12, 2001 to October 21, 2002 1. Salaries and Wages P80,000 x 13.30 months = P1,064,000.00 2. 13 th month pay P1,064,000.00 / 12 = 88,666.67 3. VL P80,000 / 26 x 10 days = 34,102.56 P1,186,769.23 B. Attorneys Fees (10%) 118,676.92 P1,305,446.15 SO ORDERED.
G.R. NO. 166507 - AMKOR TECHNOLOGY PHILIPPINES, INC., ANTHONY MICHAEL PETRUCCI AND ROSEMARIE S. KATALBAS, VS. NORY A. JUANGCO. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 166507 -
CaseG.R. NO. 162468 - AMA COMPUTER COLLEGE, INC., AMABLE R. AGUILUZ V, AND CARMELITA R. CONDENUEVO, VS. ZENAIDA R. GARAY.
G.R. NO. 162468 -
CaseG.R. No. 214961 - BANCO DE ORO UNIBANK, INC., VS. GUILLERMO C. SAGAYSAY.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 214961 -