Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, the Court finds respondent Rosalie B. Maranan, Court Stenographer III, Regional Trial Court, Branch 20, Imus, Cavite, GUILTY of Grave Misconduct and Conduct Prejudicial to the Best Interest of the Service and is accordingly DISMISSED from the service, with prejudice to re-employment in any government agency including government-owned or controlled corporations. Her retirement benefits, except accrued leave credits are ordered forfeited. This decision shall be immediately executory.
WHEREFORE, the Court finds respondent Rosalie B. Maranan, Court Stenographer III, Regional Trial Court, Branch 20, Imus, Cavite, GUILTY of Grave Misconduct and Conduct Prejudicial to the Best Interest of the Service and is accordingly DISMISSED from the service, with prejudice to re-employment in any government agency including government-owned or controlled corporations. Her retirement benefits, except accrued leave credits are ordered forfeited. This decision shall be immediately executory. The Court further Resolves to REQUIRE Judge Fernando L. Felicen , Regional Trial Court, Branch 20, Imus, Cavite and Atty. Renante C. Bihasa , to file their Comments on their alleged participation in the anomalous activities of the respondent, within fifteen (15) days from notice. This directive is without prejudice to the investigation of all or selected employees and officials of the Branch, who may have participated in anomalous transactions relating to annulment of marriage. The Office of the Court Administrator is hereby directed to submit to this Court, within thirty (30) days, a list of the annulment of marriage decisions of Judge Fernando L. Felicen for the past ten (10) years, indicating therein the judgments made and the names of participating lawyers and prosecutors. The Office of the Chief Attorney shall analyze the submitted data, including the records of and the proceedings in the listed cases, and recommend to the Court the actions it should take in the event a pattern of corruption involving annulment of marriage cases emerges. The Office of the Chief Attorney is given ninety (90) days from receipt of the Office of the Court Administrators list, within which to submit its recommendations to the Court. The Office of the Court Administrator shall likewise refer this administrative case and its records to the Ombudsman for whatever action it may take within its jurisdiction. SO ORDERED.
A.M. No. P-11-3024 - OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR, COMPLAINANT, VS. MA. IRISSA G. MUSNGI, COURT LEGAL RESEARCHER II, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, JUDICIAL REGION III, BRANCH 36, GAPAN CITY, NUEVA ECIJA.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. No. P-11-3024
CaseA.M. NO. P-04-1816 (FORMERLY OCA-IPI NO. 03-1747-P) - EUSEBIO M. BARON, COMPLAINANT, VS. EMILADIE T. ANACAN, COURT STENOGRAPHER III, RTC-BRANCH 45, SAN JOSE OCCIDENTAL MINDORO.
A.M. NO. P-04-1816
CaseEXECUTIVE JUDGE EDMUNDO P. PINTAC V. ROLANDO O. RUIZ, PROCESS SERVER, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 15, OZAMIZ CITY
A.M. No. RTJ-20-2597