TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , the Court finds respondent Atty. Orlando O. Ailes GUILTY of violating Rule 7.03 of Canon 7 as well as the entire Canon 8 of the Code of Professional Responsibility.
WHEREFORE , the Court finds respondent Atty. Orlando O. Ailes GUILTY of violating Rule 7.03 of Canon 7 as well as the entire Canon 8 of the Code of Professional Responsibility. He is hereby ADMONISHED to be more circumspect in dealing with his professional colleagues and STERNLY WARNED that a commission of the same or similar acts in the future shall be dealt with more severely. SO ORDERED.
A.C. No. 10949 (Formerly CBD Case No. 13-3915) - CARMELITA CANETE, COMPLAINANT, VS. ATTY. ARTEMIO PUTI.
A.C. No. 10949
CaseA.C. No. 6210 - FEDERICO N. RAMOS, COMPLAINANT, VS. ATTY. PATRICIO A. NGASEO.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
A.C. No. 6210
CaseA.C. No. 12121 (Formerly CBD Case No. 14-4322) - CELESTINO MALECDAN, COMPLAINANT, VS. ATTY. SIMPSON T. BALDO.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
A.C. No. 12121