Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, the complaint filed by the complainant Arlene Martin is hereby DISMISSED for utter lack of merit. However, considering the length of service of complaint and for humanitarian reason she would be given financial assistance based on one-month pay on every year of service.” On appeal, the NLRC in a decision dated February 26, 1993, reversed the labor arbiter’s ruling, the dispositive portion of the decision [3] reads: “WHEREFORE, the appealed Decision is hereby SET ASIDE and VACATED.
WHEREFORE, the complaint filed by the complainant Arlene Martin is hereby DISMISSED for utter lack of merit. However, considering the length of service of complaint and for humanitarian reason she would be given financial assistance based on one-month pay on every year of service. On appeal, the NLRC in a decision dated February 26, 1993, reversed the labor arbiters ruling, the dispositive portion of the decision [3] reads: WHEREFORE, the appealed Decision is hereby SET ASIDE and VACATED. Another one ENTERED ordering respondent to pay complainant her backwages and separation pay in the total amount of P83,392.40. Complainants other claims are hereby DISMISSED for lack of merit. SO ORDERED.