TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , the Complaint against Atty. Vitto A. Kintanar is DISMISSED for lack of merit. SO ORDERED.
WHEREFORE , the Complaint against Atty. Vitto A. Kintanar is DISMISSED for lack of merit. SO ORDERED.
A.C. No. 13559 (Formerly CBD Case No. 14-4205) - KANG TAE SIK, COMPLAINANT, VS. ATTY. ALEX Y. TAN AND ATTY. ROBERTO S. FEDERIS.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.C. No. 13559
CaseA.C. No. 7910 - WEN MING W CHEN, A.K.A. DOMINGO TAN, COMPLAINANT, VS. ATTY. F.D. NICOLAS B. PICHAY. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.C. No. 7910
CaseA.M. No. MTJ-03-1506 (A.M. OCA-IPI No. 01-995-MTJ) - PABLO B. MABINI, COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE LORINDA B. TOLEDO-MUPAS, MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT, DASMARIÑAS, CAVITE.R E S O L U T I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. No. MTJ-03-1506