Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, premises considered, the Petition is DENIED . The CA Decision dated 8 August 2013 and Resolution dated 6 January 2014 are AFFIRMED in toto . SO ORDERED.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, the Petition is DENIED . The CA Decision dated 8 August 2013 and Resolution dated 6 January 2014 are AFFIRMED in toto . SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 210955 - DANILO A. LERONA, VS. SEA POWER SHIPPING ENTERPRISES, INC. AND/OR NEDA MARITIME AGENCY CO., LTD., AND/OR MS. ANTONETTE A. GUERRERO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 210955 -
CaseG.R. No. 243459 - HEIRS OF THE LATE MARCELINO O. NEPOMUCENO, REPRESENTED BY HIS WIFE, MA. FE L. NEPOMUCENO, VS. NAESS SHIPPING PHILS., INC./ROYAL DRAGON OCEAN TRANSPORT, INC..DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 243459 -
CaseG.R. No. 247410 - NILO D. LAFUENTE AND BILLY C. PANAGUITON, VS. DAVAO CENTRAL WAREHOUSE CLUB, INC., AND LILY S. YAP, CORPORATE SECRETARY. - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 247410 -