Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , the March 31, 2005 Decision of the Court of Appeals and its March 23, 2006 Resolution are hereby REVERSED and SET ASIDE . The dismissal order of the Regional Trial Court dated November 15, 1999 is hereby set aside. Steelcase’s Amended Complaint is hereby ordered REINSTATED and the case is REMANDED to the RTC for appropriate action. SO ORDERED.
WHEREFORE , the March 31, 2005 Decision of the Court of Appeals and its March 23, 2006 Resolution are hereby REVERSED and SET ASIDE . The dismissal order of the Regional Trial Court dated November 15, 1999 is hereby set aside. Steelcases Amended Complaint is hereby ordered REINSTATED and the case is REMANDED to the RTC for appropriate action. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 121159 - VSC COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISES, INC., VS. COURT OF APPEALS, OSCAR ESTOPACE AND JOSE SILAPAN.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 121159 -
CaseG.R. NO. 173979 - AUCTION IN MALINTA, INC., VS. WARREN EMBES LUYABEN. DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 173979 -
CaseG.R. No. 140249 - DANILO S. YAP, VS. COURT OF APPEALS, ALEJANDRO DY JUANCO, UNIVERSAL MILL SUPPLY CO. INC. AND BEE QUEEN RESTAURANT, INC..G.R. NO. 140363MARTINEZ LEYBA, INC., VS. COURT OF APPEALS, ALENJANDRO DY JUANCO, UNIVERSAL MILL SUPPLY CO. INC. AND BEE QUEEN RESTAURANT, INC..D E C I S I O N - S
G.R. No. 140249 -